TestFi vs Maze

They solve different problems. Maze is ideal for testing Figma and Sketch prototypes before you build, it gives you click heatmaps, misclick rates, and task-completion analytics. TestFi is for testing your real, shipped app after it is live. If your app is already on the App Store or Google Play and you want video feedback from real testers, TestFi is the right tool.

Absolutely. Many teams use Maze during the design phase to validate prototypes, then switch to TestFi once the app is built and published. Maze catches design-level issues early; TestFi catches real-world usability problems, crashes, and performance issues that only appear on actual devices.

TestFi does not generate click heatmaps. Instead, you get full video recordings of each tester using your app on their real device, plus an AI-generated analysis that highlights usability issues and assigns a session quality score. This gives you richer qualitative insight than click coordinates alone.

No. TestFi has zero design-tool dependencies. You simply share your app's store link or a TestFlight / internal testing link, write your test instructions, and testers install the real app on their device. No Figma, no Sketch, no prototyping tool required.

Maze charges $99/month per seat on its paid plans, so a three-person team pays nearly $300/month. TestFi has no seats, you pay $1.99 to $3.99 per completed test session regardless of team size. No subscription required.